War Thunder Dev Tracker

Devs released a fix a few seconds ago. Don't hesitate to give some feedback, they're watching!

Thanks.

This was passed to the dev team (had a chat recently about it), i believe they're working on the issue.

Update: problem identified, devs are working on it.

Zmieniono parametry pancerza czołgów amerykańskich i radzieckich (otwórz tabelkę).

Zmiany w parametrach opancerzenia amerykańskich i radzieckich czołgów podstawowych

W niedawno opublikowanym rejestrze zmian aktualizacji „Ognisty Deszcz” znaleźliśmy kilka błędów w parametrach ochrony radzieckich czołgów podstawowych, podczas gdy parametry w grze były w większości ustawione poprawnie. Naprawiliśmy te problemy, a teraz przedstawiamy najnowsze wartości opancerzenia. Dodatkowo poprawiono parametry opancerzenia czołgów serii M1 Abrams.

Dla wież radzieckich czołgów podstawowych przyjęto wartości ochrony w sektorze ± 30° od osi pojazdu; oznacza to, że kiedy czołg zostanie uderzony z tych kątów, wskazana jest minimalna wartość ochrony. W przypadku trafienia z kąta kursu 0° ...

Hey, we forwarded the issue to the devs, they're looking at it right now.

The protection parameters of the US and Soviet main battle tanks have been changed (open chart).

Changes to protection parameters of the American and Soviet MBTs:

In the recently published changelog for the “Raining Fire” update, a few mistakes were made in the protection parameters of Soviet MBTs, while those parameters in the game were mostly set correctly. We have corrected these issues, and now present the latest protection values. In addition, the protection parameters on the M1 Abrams series of tanks have been adjusted.

For turrets of Soviet MBT’s, the protection values in the sector of course angles ± 30° from the vehicle axis are used; this means that when a tank gets hit from these angles, protection is provided at a minimum as indicated. In the case of hitti...

Od 16 września do 30 września

Zniżki dla Graczy Playstation 4, dodatkowa zniżka dla subskrybentów PlayStation Plus!

25% Zniżki (50% z PlayStation®Plus)

AH-1S Cobra -25% / -50% z PS Plus


JASDF Sabre -25% / -50% z PS Plus


PG 02 -25% / -50% z PS Plus


M4A4 Sherman -25% / -50% z PS Plus


Shenyang F-5 -25% / -50% z PS Plus

Typ 74 Mod G/Kai -25% / -50% z PS Plus


Zestaw Startowy USA -25% / -50% z PS Plus


Zestaw Startowy ZSRR -25% / -50% z PS Plus


Japońska Kampania Pacyficzna (1941-1943) -25% / -50% z PS Plus

15% Zniżki (30% z PlayStation®Plus)

A129 Ma...

The protection parameters of the US and Soviet main battle tanks have been changed (open chart).

Changes to protection parameters of the American and Soviet MBTs:

In the recently published changelog for the “Raining Fire” update, a few mistakes were made in the protection parameters of Soviet MBTs, while those parameters in the game were mostly set correctly. We have corrected these issues, and now present the latest protection values. In addition, the protection parameters on the M1 Abrams series of tanks have been adjusted.

For turrets of Soviet MBT’s, the protection values in the sector of course angles ± 30° from the vehicle axis are used; this means that when a tank gets hit from these angles, protection is provided at a minimum as indicated. In the case of hitti...

Once again, this was the commemoration of the 80th anniversary of the battle that ended in a victory for the RAF. Not Germany. Germany did indeed partake and that's why they are in the Battle of Britain events going on as part of this event. So they are very much included.

It's also worth pointing out that almost every event we have includes a German reward vehicle of some kind, so Germany has had more than it's fair share.

There was only ever going to be 1 reward vehicle for this event so it made 100 percent sense to be a British example. We cannot simply make multiple reward vehicles for every event all the time. We often have smaller events with a single reward. We have had multiple events this year with lots of rewards.

As for the decal, what's ugly to you is not to others. Lots of people like it and have reacted very well to it. Nobody is forcing you to use it if you don't wis...

Hi!

This issue should be resolved now.

Thanks!

None of this changes what I said. All of them are interesting machines that players were happy to see.

As I said, not every event vehicle is production and not every event vehicle is prototype. They are a mix of both with the main goal of being interesting.

As per the terms on the event article:

The vehicle was not even released. It was given to content creators early to create videos to show the vehicles. At no point is a repair cost ever "final".

Not all event vehicles are production vehicles. There are already also prototypes and experimental vehicles too. At the same time, its worth noting, not all players want prototypes and obscure / unknown that they know nothing about. The general response and feedback on the F-11 and Ar-196 when we announced them was largely positive.

Squadron vehicles are also getting a regular supply of vehicles.

Im not sure after several attempts over the last week or so and responses of me saying that we cant answer anything yet, people still try

This has quite literally nothing to do with the topic. Picking a vehicle and asking if its coming is wishlisting.

Production numbers are not the only factor. Event vehicles also cover unique and interesting examples as well. Event vehicles have to be interesting, otherwise people are not interested.

6 people have voted on this.

We cannot reasonably implement or consider every vehicle after 6 people request them.

The topic as a whole is mostly suggesting aircraft that have already been suggested previously and answered before.

Again, its not to say that wont come. But its unreasonable to expect all of these aircraft, particularly many that most people dont even know about / ask about to come soon.

T-14 and T-90MS were not created to counter the leopoard 2A5 and M1A2 Abrams but were in fact contemporaries to much later variants of both of those series of tanks.

Right now, we have no plans at all for the T-14 in any conceivable close future and the T-90MS is also not in any very close plans.

Firstly, im not a developer, but a Community Manager.

Secondly, ive responded several times on the subject of all of the aircraft you have mentioned and other similar ones very clearly that whilst we dont have any current / immediate plans for them, we also dont exclude the possibility of adding them in the future.

Thats not really what was said in the post. More a direct claim that we are somehow making less tech tree vehicles whilst also increasing the number of premiums. Which is not accurate at all.

Regardless, F-11 is not really an "iconic" aircraft and it was only in service for a short window with limited numbers. The US tree is hardly short of jet aircraft and there are many more still to come in the future head for both the USAF and USN.