Battlefield V Dev Tracker

Let me get that info. I’ll update the OP with it.

Looking forward to your next creation, buddy!

That’s the data we looked at. And put the big maps closer together.

Neat fact I found out! The new rotation doesn’t mean every server will be the same. Some started earlier/later in the rotation. So folks that want to play big maps closer together can, then jump to another server and check the current map to know where it is in rotation, while folks that prefer the city/closer quarters maps with my bail on a server when Hamada or Panzerstorm come up in the middle of the rotation.

Let me look into that with the team tomorrow morning.

Edit: So it's a funky config issue that isn't behaving quite as we'd like (it's being looked into for an upcoming update) but you all should be able to do this on each platform to clear that up.

The funky part is that it depends on which class placed the AP Mine. If it was placed by a Recon, other Recons can defuse them, and so on across the classes. It's not ideal, we would prefer to ensure that each class can do it regardless.

That's fair feedback. Will share in the morning (I've only gilded one gun and you're right, I stick to a different sight too)

Apologies - was out for evening playing Football! It was a painful experience, I don't recommend it!

So :) Update time!

We do have something that we want to talk to everyone about concerning Ranks, and the current cap of 50. Everything is scoped and there's a pretty robust design in place.

Now its all about understanding what development resource can be committed to bringing it over the line. Once they've finalised their prioritisation processes, and can tell me when to expect it in the game, that's the point where we lift the curtain and open the conversation with you all.

I've been told to expect an update from the gang on Friday so I'll be sure to tag whatever I can, prominently, into the weekly wrap up.

I'm hoping that no matter when it's expected, we'll still be able to tell you what it is that we're doing, on Friday. If it's coming sooner rather than later, we'll likely go into more detail than if it's expected further down the road,...

We’ll have a bunch more contests.

Quite impressive videos, congratulations to all the winners and to those finalists getting some loot too!

You were still a finalist, buddy.
Your artbook is on the way!

I'll make sure the next rules are a little clearer on being able to make montages/multi-clip videos.
You still did great!

They should be fixed with the next update.

like it's some sort of lottery. Hooray, we won, we got our prize. Keep laughing.

I don't understand this reference, but I'll address the other part.

Well, excuse me, I don't mean to sound rude but from our perspective this looks like you can literally ban anyone you want and hide behind your standard excuse

I don't think you're being rude. I can understand frustration. I'm sorry that it looks that way, but that's 100% not the case.

The fact is, as I've stated above, the appeals go to TOS and go DIRECTLY to the anti-cheat admin - who saves all evidence and has all the details on why a ban was put in place. If there is any potential doubt about the veracity of a ban, the investigation continues BEFORE the ban happens.
In the case of compromised accounts (which do happen because people don't want to do simple things like add Google Authenticator or other 2FA security measures on their accou...

I know, man. I know. I raised concerns about this with the team Monday and yesterday.

I appreciate it.

On April 5th, 2019, we opened up the first (of many) content contests featuring our partnership with Nvidia.

https://i.redd.it/pj0rwadychy21.jpg

The rules were pretty simple:

• Play Firestorm as a Squad or Solo.
• Capture some great moments in-game, showing off #OnlyinBattlefield moments.
• Submit a 90-180 second HD YouTube clip of that video.

And the prize? Pretty fantastic, I must say. Squad Contest winners receive FOUR Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080TI GPUs (one for each member of their squad) and Solo winners receive one video card.

https://i.redd.it/ygelfyh1dhy21.jpg

So, how'd the first #OnlyinBattlefieldV #Firestorm contest turn out? Pretty good! We had over 800 submissions in the two weeks the contest was running. We ended up with around 10 finalists (combined). Gotta read the rules if you enter a contest. ...

Secure 5000 Company Coin in a new Weekly Storyline that features our variation of Breakthrough we call Fortress.

Complete this Week's Storyline and you'll be rewarded with the 5000 Company Coins to spend on Specializations or Skins to customize your soldier or weapons.

https://i.redd.it/pmtbeq4kefy21.jpg

Let’s look at the tasks. Remember that the exact mission requirements can be found in game in the Tides of War menu.

Fortress - 4,500 Chapter XP
Play a round of Fortress.

Huff and Puff - 10,000 Chapter XP
Destroy 15 Fortifications in enemy objective areas.

Strong Walls - 10,000 Chapter XP
Build 10 ...

Well, the fact THIS particularly case has been reviewed by the anti-cheat (a person) at least 4 times - there's nothing to prove, especially with the evidence the team has (and no, we cannot release the evidence as it literally would undermine the entirety of our anti-cheat process and detection methods.) And, honestly, the occurrence of true false positives is negligible. The team is dedicated in not having these occur, and so when there is a ban, it's pretty irrefutable.

That’s a fair point. But again, if the advisor goes into detail on what triggered the ban, it can be used to update/re-engineer cheats to be harder to detect.

And you wouldn’t believe the amount of blatant cheaters - super obvious hacks and whatnot- that claim innocence.

Yeah, we don’t use 3rd party sites for stat tracking - we track them much more efficiently and accurately internally. And - we don’t base bans on stats. We base bans on cheating.

Well, thanks for that clarification. Personally, a slap on the hand and a slap on the face denote two different approaches. But that’s just my opinion, the later being an insult/abusive compared to the former being used as a reprimand, especially when you called me a “rude bastard”.

And no, I don’t apologize for closing down a thread. That’s part of moderation on the forums - especially if a thread turns non-constructive, goes off the rails, or if the thread has reached its conclusion. (And I don’t moderate forums anymore because we have a whole team that handles that now, so I focus on larger concerns/items in the community.)

As the advisor mentioned in your case, you can send it to them.