EVE Online

EVE Online Dev Tracker




30 Apr

Post

Do you know what would help with that? Look at the non-bloc candidates who are running, and get people to vote for them.

The only way to break the power of a bloc vote, is to dilute it.

And good news! the CSM elections using a Wright STV system, which means if the first candidate you vote for doesn’t get enough votes to survive an elimination round, your entire vote moves to your next candidate (who hasn’t been eliminated) So you don’t even need to agree on the order of votes, as long as you put them all down.

Post

Screenshot - 1920x1080.jpg1920×1080 974 KB

Greetings,

Everyone is welcome to discuss the upcoming CSM 14 elections in this forum thread. Some eager players have already started to put their candidature forward, so even if not yet officially confirmed, you might want to take a moment to read their proposals.

... Read more
Comment

I’ve spoken to a few people about having an MT scheduled to include players in the UTC-4 to UTC-8 range to make it more convenient for most residents of the Americas.

There are no plans at present, but I have hopes for the future. Plus staying at work til 1AM means I might get food out of the deal. We’ll keep you all posted.

Comment

You already have the client (we’ve been packaging the 64bit folder for a while now), but it will only be made active through the launcher during the window for this test.

At present, that window opens on Monday the 6th.

Comment

Doing the lord's work <3


29 Apr


28 Apr


26 Apr


25 Apr

Comment

Originally posted by ccp_habakuk

The reason was to be able to better focus on the newer bug reports, which are more likely to be relevant (= more likely to result in an internal defect, which can be fixed), while accepting the fact, that we currently do not have the resources (within CCP, through outsourcers and through our volunteer bug hunters) to go through the full backlog of old reports.

Oh, and if you go to https://www.ccpgames.com/careers, then you will find that we are also hiring QA.

Comment

Originally posted by Apollo_Manson

"We had too many tickets so we mass closed them" how is this acceptable? What was the reason you "had" to close them? Missing SLAs? Why not admit you had too many and do your best to work through them? Just another reason I've lost faith in CCP as a corporation.

The reason was to be able to better focus on the newer bug reports, which are more likely to be relevant (= more likely to result in an internal defect, which can be fixed), while accepting the fact, that we currently do not have the resources (within CCP, through outsourcers and through our volunteer bug hunters) to go through the full backlog of old reports.