Magic The Gathering: Arena

Magic The Gathering: Arena Dev Tracker




16 Jul

Comment

@Gunkslinger:

@WotC_Lexie:
I was given the okay to give out exact numbers, so here it goes... Only about 50 people were suspended (and only for five days). The people who were suspended were clicking the cat over 150 per minute, and it was constant. There were thousands of clicks per game. It wasn't a one time thing, either. This was over multiple matches.


If you have been just absentmindedly clicking the cat, you won't get in trouble.
This is where I go from an Arena whale to a FTP.
"I was given the okay to give out exact numbers, so here it goes... Only about 50 people."

How does 'exact' equal 'only about'?


I can pull the EXACT number of people suspended, but it doesn't matter whether it was 47 people or 52. What matters is the click numbers. :information_desk_person:

Comment

@Njordin:

@WotC_Lexie:
I was given the okay to give out exact numbers, so here it goes... Only about 50 people were suspended (and only for five days). The people who were suspended were clicking the cat over 150 per minute, and it was constant. There were thousands of clicks per game. It wasn't a one time thing, either. This was over multiple matches.


If you have been just absentmindedly clicking the cat, you won't get in trouble.

All those are great, but is there a chance to give us an option to hide our opponents' cats in the first place ? Just like we can permanently disable emotes ?

You can. Mute emotes, and it mutes the cat too.

Comment

I was given the okay to give out exact numbers, so here it goes... Only about 50 people were suspended (and only for five days). The people who were suspended were clicking the cat over 150 per minute, and it was constant. There were thousands of clicks per game. It wasn't a one time thing, either. This was over multiple matches.


If you have been just absentmindedly clicking the cat, you won't get in trouble.

Comment

Originally posted by RussischerZar

I think it would be great if you could implement a "are you sure you really want to target your opponent or his stuff" rider on all beneficial auras and spells.

I mean the reverse is already there for detrimental spells :)

My top comment in this thread explains why that's not feasible for auras. For most spells though, we already DO have this warning system in place. For example, if you accidentally start to Giant Growth your opponent's creature, you should be getting warned. #wotc_staff

Comment

Weā€™re adding a fix to keep players from ā€˜spamā€™ clicking the cat on 7/25. In the meantime, our support team is taking action against players who are clearly abusing the function (thousands+ of transformations per game, and doing it across several games).


15 Jul

Comment

Originally posted by that1dev

I don't think this has anything to do with arena. Paper tournament in a format not available to arena and all that. Far more fitting in /r/magictcg.

We did also post the survival guide to /r/magictcg. And you're right, it's not a perfect fit here, but we want to make sure everyone has the important information necessary about the tournament. Just in case they're interested :)

Comment

Originally posted by OrdinaryFinger

Modern

Bold of you to assume I will be able to understanding anything past the first land drop.

This could be a good time to see if you're interested in the format! :)

Comment

Originally posted by UnbanEyeOfUgin

The real issue is the lag that stuttering and even make this possible.

He clearly selected one card then it snapped to another.

How do you guys not see that as an issue?

Of course that's an issue. As a rules engine person, I don't have much insight into why that happened. However, I can answer why there is no warning dialog. #wotc_staff.

Comment

Originally posted by MrGlobalVariable

You'd think there would be an "are you sure" dialog. I can't zap myself with Sorin without clicking through a dialog.

The targeting semantics for Wolfkin Bond are simply "Enchant creature". We can't tell whether that's good or bad for the purposes of warnings - that's the same ability Pacifism has. #wotc_staff

Comment

@Solow#23857:

@WotC_Lexie:


@Solow#23857:
I guess this is a heads up to all who actually pay to play.
Also I have no issue with F2P players but I love how certain F2P players within this post have admitted that they will never pay to play, being that WoTC hasn't given them a reason to buy anything, think that they have the right to decide what the pay to play players get to do with the products that they paid hard earned money for.
I guess they feel that somehow them constantly acting as if they are the protector of WoTC is payment enough for the dev's and will pay to keep this game running.
1. Stop calling out players and trolling. Read our ...
Read more
Comment

@Solow#23857:

I guess this is a heads up to all who actually pay to play.
Also I have no issue with F2P players but I love how certain F2P players within this post have admitted that they will never pay to play, being that WoTC hasn't given them a reason to buy anything, think that they have the right to decide what the pay to play players get to do with the products that they paid hard earned money for.
I guess they feel that somehow them constantly acting as if they are the protector of WoTC is payment enough for the dev's and will pay to keep this game running.

1. Stop calling out players and trolling. Read our ...

Read more
Comment

@Solow#23857:

@WotC_Lexie:


@Deylios Darksol:
For those getting banned, I would wager a guess that you did it more than once, figured it out and proceeded to continue to abuse the mechanic in game. I am 100% positive WotC pulled the logs of the people that were banned, saw that they were doing this action on multiple occasions, and offered them a 5 day vacation from the game.


Let's be honest, most people who have the cats have clicked fast a few times and gone about their game, not causing disconnects and not been banned. I know I have done that.
This. We ran the numbers. If you clicked on the cat an insane amount of times in a match multiple times, you got a suspension. It wasn't a matter of just clicking the cat a few times... Or even a few hundred times a match... It was far, far more than that.


As I tell everyone who gets banne...
Read more
Comment

@Deylios Darksol:

For those getting banned, I would wager a guess that you did it more than once, figured it out and proceeded to continue to abuse the mechanic in game. I am 100% positive WotC pulled the logs of the people that were banned, saw that they were doing this action on multiple occasions, and offered them a 5 day vacation from the game.


Let's be honest, most people who have the cats have clicked fast a few times and gone about their game, not causing disconnects and not been banned. I know I have done that.

This. We ran the numbers. If you clicked on the cat an insane amount of times in a match multiple times, you got a suspension. It wasn't a matter of just clicking the cat a few times... Or even a few hundred times a match... It was far, far more than that.


As I tell everyone who gets banned/suspended and finds it unfair, you can reply to the original email to contest it.

...

14 Jul

Comment

Originally posted by [deleted]

[deleted]

It's been there all along - nothing about its logic has changed since closed beta. The messaging for it has improved on the client though. And there are a lot more decks in M20 that are running up against its complaint limits I guess. #wotc_staff


13 Jul