devtrackers.gg
So if you corrupt and get a corrupted implicit on these jewels it'll be a separate modifier?
So if you corrupt and get a corrupted implicit on these jewels it'll be a separate modifier?
Implicit Mods (including corrupted implicits) are separate from Enchantment Mods.
This was my fault and I feel bad about it. I've fixed this now -- expect to see the fix go live when Delirium releases, sorry!
Filters can detect enchantments, however the jewel 'type' does not count as an enchantment.
As for the cluster jewels... well, I hope GGG will implement a special way of filtering the jewels by jewel "type", as of right now the filter can't distinguish them.
By the way here's a full list of economy-data I rely on.
These tierlists get updated every update and the economy-updated versions get improved every 4 hours:
Each tierlis has it's own configuration, lots of special aspect information to represent ingame knowledge and some special rules to keep everything sophisticated and accurate.
Hey, so, in that Item Filter update, I made AnyEnchantment only match Labyrinth Enchants, since those were the only type of enchants that could drop at the time. But since we are adding Cluster Jewels in 3.10.0, which always have a special enchant, I have reconsidered this decision and so from 3.10.0 "AnyEnchantment" will match any visible enchantment mod, including Labyrinth enchants, Anointments, and Cluster Jewels, as well as any future enchant mods we may add.
So for 3.10, you should be able filter for Cluster Jewels as any Jewel that also has an enchant. Or, by simply filtering by their spec...
Read moreNobody is gonna see this comment so I can safely say that: I will play melee berserker on Delirium league!!!
Nice
It's not that they're unable to do it, because it's complicated or something. In fact it would be 15 minutes of dev time (somehow they had time to update the fragments tab). But if it comes to currency tab... they're playing possum. Despite there are tons of such threads here, they keep ignoring them for months. Not even a single response. In the meantime, /u/bex_ggg replies in this thread within less than one minute since its creation... Funny.
I haven't replied to this because I don't have any new information for you. I've been talking to several developers about what kind of options we have to improve this situation but the discussion is still in progress.
It doesn't have to be in that specific socket, does it?
Any of the outer sockets.
[deleted]
It's completely optional.
There is an option for your map device that means it will pick randomly from your entire set but they'll all match on your map device.
Then why does it show a map device with all different portals on the thumbnail?
It does both things.
Okay I'm definitely buying the new supporter pack with portal now! This is awesome!
Will we be able to pick which ones are included or is it all-or-nothing?
How it currently works is that it picks from all of your portals at random. There is an option for your map device that means it will pick randomly from your entire set but they'll all match on your map device. So for example, for one map you might get all Infernal Portals and then for the next you might get all Demon King portals. There is interest among the team in having a list of favourites which allows you to curate your best portals to be chosen at random but I'm not sure of its feasibility at this point.
Edit: Since it's been asked a few times I'll just tack the answer on here, if you have multiple copies of the same portal it will only be counted as one for this purpose.
