Next yak track starts Monday
Next Yak is in progress but will not be coming on Monday, there was a social post that accidentally went out - https://www.reddit.com/r/runescape/comments/yypeio/comment/iwvgoss/?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=web2x&context=3
Hi, If you copy the error message you see (and remove any potentially personal information) I can help you out here. If you can log into the game, you can log into the website so there might just be some confusion around what error you're actually getting.
Edit: We've identified the issue with /u/YesoPro's help, and have some work to resolve this in discussion internally. Little bit of confusion on both sides which we hope to have resolved within the week to prevent it happening again. YesoPro can however log in as expected now.
You may have noticed this post disappeared quickly - and that's because we've made a slight (intentional) release date shift on this today that didn't sneak into the scheduled post updates in time.
You'll hear more about it soon, but it's not releasing on Monday to confirm!
I cant decide if I like this type of communication where there is alot of one way delivery. (it is better than nothing I suppose). The danger is that without player feedback/input some fantastic ideas for the game will never be heard.
Yeah player feedback is why I'm doing the streams in the first place. I think I'm trying to cover too much each week though, which isn't leaving enough time for chat and Q&A. I'll try to do smaller topics so it's not just a rush of me saying stuff.
While that's true it's still factually incorrect to have on the slide without some kind of mention of an exception to the rule on the same slide. I do agree that it's a small oversight but it still hurts the integrity of the presentation - Especially in a format like streaming on Twitch where people might not be there from the start.
If you don't see how that's an issue beyond this one example I'm more than happy to elaborate.
It is on the same slide, and clipping just that line, then titling your thread with the implication that I didn't know Nastroth exists is just dishonest.
I literally mentioned Nastroth on the same slide.
Apologies folks, the broadcasts were intended to be pulled to avoid situations like this but unfortunately, that wasn't the case, the stream is currently rescheduled for next Tuesday (22nd) .
This answers absolutely nothing. When you have news post stating one thing. Mod Azanna stating the above and Mod Frosch once again stating different things.
I would greatly appriciate a simple concise answer here.
Unfortunately, there isn't a simple concise answer.
The goal is to bring back the rewards where applicable, in the case of specific rewards what's applicable changes.
If for example, we ran another FSW in the future it would make sense to have Halos again, but we don't have that all planned out at this moment so giving a "Yes this is definitely happening" or "no this won't ever happen" style answer is likely to blow up in our faces.
Watched him for 40 minutes, close to an hour. I mined the southern most ore he was mining, consistently mining it before he was.
He still banked after missing out on every 3rd ore He ignored me when I said I'm recording him He ignored me when I posted the thread about him His actions were the same for a solid hour, banking a half full inventory of ore after clicking on ore nodes exactly 28 times.
This is 100% a not, this is not a human playing
I mean, disregarding the fact it's not a bot... I don't reply to anyone on my personal account even if it's someone trying to provoke a response.
I ran into people attempting to move me off of the iron nodes at Al Kharid in the early days of group iron man. I persisted, they got tired.
Hey Folks, unfortunately due to an illness there won't be the scheduled "Making Garden of Kharid" stream today. It is tentatively rescheduled to Tuesday next week.
Doesn't look like a bot, to be honest.
I appreciate you taking the time to have your say!
As you say, it seems that something was lost in translation when it came to setting out what this intermediary plot is supposed to be.
I like the idea you have of the Infernal Puzzlebox actually being a part of the story, rather than just something that has bonuses magically put on it as you complete content. The Enriched Shadow Ring, for example, changed as it got more unlocks, whether it be by crafting it through archaeology or enriching it with energy from Erebus. Here, perhaps, completing the requirements for a tier unlocks a new face of the box and, by extension, the relevant tier perk. Then, the “completed” puzzle box has something of relevance to the quest finale (I’m not sure what that would be).
Yes exactly. We realised this structure would work better pretty much immediately, but the quest was already deep in development by that point and it would have been too disruptive to go back and rejig everything. (We did retroactively put a miniquest in the reborn update.)
Can you also fix the bug with the Het's Oasis cactus patch where the Desert task reward for doubling cacti harvested does not double when the farming cape noting effect procs on it?
I've asked QA to put a job in, i'll fix it yeah.
devtrackers.gg
