JagexSponge

Yep, everything should give their primary type after the fix (e.g. Revenants - give rev soul, Skeletal wyverns give Skeletal wyvern souls etc)

Hey - thanks for the thread, figured it was helpful for everyone if I respond - i'll update if any more come through on here:

Feel free to comment if you wanna discuss any of the bits here.

The fixes below may not necessarily be in Mondays build

Bugs

When using an ushabti to capture the souls of certain slayer monsters, the incorrect soul is stored.

• Fixed - This was an ordering issue when I updated all undead in the game to use the new slayer categories - my bad!

The instakill slayer buff from guardhouse works inconsistently on monsters that have multiple phases.

• This is actually intended, the guardhouse perk is an execute not a true instakill, meaning it still respects the combat system/creature phases.

Issues:

Enabling of special slayer assignment is not prompted when getting a task from the Raptor for the first time

• This is a good idea...

Technically this is a seperate issue to teleporting - this is 'just' a missed param on the npc config that hides it until it's spawn anim has played. We've got a bug in for it, probably won't make it in time for mondays build though.

Hey just checked in on this, Stu has fixed the issue, hoping the fix will be in the build for Monday update. - Sponge

Hey we're aware of this - I'm working on a temporary fix that's hotfixable that'll make this wall buildable until we can do a proper fix.

Hey, i've just fixed, this camel is about to test then we'll get a hotfix out when it's through.

Hey we've got a bug in for this now, we're gonna see if we can get a solution in that is hotfixable

All good - I look forward to seeing your opening, best of luck!

Hey, I'm technically not supposed to be working right now, but figured I'd check out our bug-reporting channels at work and see if this had been highlighted (Pretty invested in seeing a 1k tetra opening).

One of the other devs has already investigated and pulled up your session ID, unfortunately, we can see that this is a case of misclicking. We can see in the data the incident occurred because you hit the OP-5 on the tetracompasses which is the destroy option, and then we can see 18 unpowereds get destroyed.

Sorry for your loss, but looks like misclicking and autopilot got you.

This is a contentious point, I'd actually like to discuss with the community.

In the current implementation prior to applying community changes, 4T would work with the staff but:

4TAA is something I'd (personally) like to remove from the game, I feel like it adds unintuitive complexity, that doesn't really need to exist. However, I fully understand that other players (especially those at the top of the skill ceiling) enjoy it as a form of skill expression.
Previously the combat council was shakey on removing it without giving some form of compensatory mechanic - my personal take would be to remove it without waiting for a replacement that may/may not be further down the line.

On the assumption that damage on the staff spec was increased to make up for the removal or prevention of 4TAA on it:
If given the option, what would you the players like to see happen with it?

1 4TAA Left on the staff.
2 Removal from staff effect only.
...

I know some of the players that really like numbers are going to plug this in and figure out exactly how it translates, and something I've seen in a few threads regarding recursive crits is the loss of adrenaline in part due to losing the recursion - It's worth me clarifying that the shots fired out by the FSOA post spec WOULD be able to still critically strike (triggering tsunami, and still scaling with your other crit effects, etc) it just wouldn't be able to retrigger itself.

/u/JagexSponge Any comment on the current state of Grimoire? Was it at all a consideration when FSoA rebalance was prepared?

So it's still not something that's been resolved yet.

However, I'd personally be a fan of getting the usage cost way down, or offering a similar pocket slot for crit users.

I do agree that some things in game should have high usage costs (my example would be a temporary buff you'd bring to e.g. get you over the edge to get you first zuk cape, at the cost of costing X amount and not being sustainable to continually use)
However, I don't personally think this suits the grimoire, as an item that has a decently high upfront cost and has become a pretty big component of both crit & melee builds. (I'd much rather grim have a higher ...

I mean, the effects do still exist, as they do with any standard ability - 10% proc chance iirc. (20 with dark form?) This would still apply to each of the fsoa shots post-changes, it's just not guaranteed huge pool of health that you essentially get for free.

This is like saying you have to many cookies, so I'm going to take away one cookie from you so that I can give it back at a later time. Like, we won't be happy with future magic buffs if the overall power is the same or inferior to pre-nerfed fsoa

To use your same analogy, I'd say it's more like:

You've baked one cookie with all the chocolate chips in it. So now we can't make cookies ever again, or if we do, they're going to be very unenjoyable - And the person next to you that doesn't have the giant cookie is also going to suffer from it.

Now we can leave you with the giant messy cookie. Or we could pull some chips out of it, and know that we can continue to make satisfying cookies down the line.

Gosh, I dislike analogies.

Wanna say a huge thank you to everyone for getting involved here. I'm going to do some dinner now but will continue to reply as/when I can over the next day or two.

The 100% crit chance, no, it suffers from the same problem as current live FSOA, where it just synergises TOO hard with anything crit in the future, and it's likely we'd hit the same roadblock.

However, onslaught as a whole could get a rework/tweaks to give it back natural crit &/or get some adjustments in general. - Something I'm committed too is improving/adjusting our base set of abilities, a lot have seen very little love since release.

Oh, it absolutely was done, I just don't have the numbers stored or to hand, and even taking the collective opinions of everyone with some stake in combat on our side, players are going to suggest different things or have different considerations.
This is absolutely why we're proposing the changes to you guys, because we know fully that you're going to have different considerations and an even broader breadth of knowledge.

My biggest concerns are the damage output of this new staff is trivial compared to the current one. The lightning bolts it fires out are significantly weaker than auto attacks are right now (90% damage vs ~150% + recursion).

Trying to get through as many questions as possible so apologies for pulling just a chunk out of your post here to answer -

I'm fully aware that damage might be on the lower side and could be pushed up to compensate for recursion loss at least slightly - or via other levers with the fsoa effect. However - (I'll check later if I get time to do a full side by side comparison to throw in here, but I believe the avg of an auto is fairly far from 150%, & the old and new avgs per hit are much closer than you've implied (I absolutely could be mistaken and will take that into account alongside all the feedback from the community if so - hoping to do a small write up of comparative damage values if i get a chance tonight) )

This sort of thing is the exact reasons AFAIK as to why it hasn't just been removed.

We'd need to consider all these things prior to a removal e.g. moving the mobs closer together so a dummy isnt needed.

With the proposed changes, I don't feel it necessary to nerf Zammy's damage output as an offset, as the impact shouldn't be too bad.

That being said, Zammy P7 solo & P7 onboarding is something I am hoping we can address to let players better learn the encounter, which by itself could offset this, at least slightly.