War Thunder Dev Tracker

We dont dev server any events of any kind. Internal testing is more than enough to ensure the interface works.

Its hardly a game changing matter that needs mass testing of an interface development.

It will be within this patch cycle.

Because it was not ready to be shown or announced?

This is nothing new and exactly why we always say all content on dev servers and their patch notes is not final and subject to change. The same patch last year for example, we had the FGR.2 and 2 MiG-21s added that were not shown on dev servers because they were not ready in time for dev but were in time for the patch.

If by "discussions" you mean the people who saw 2 words (Battle Pass) and instantly jumped the conclusion based on absolute zero official facts relating to War Thunder and claimed the apocalypse was now because of a single incomplete datamine, it actually shows nothing at all. Its a knee jerk reaction to something not officially announced at all with no details, no facts and no context at all.

Its indicative of nothing.

I think if you actually look at every one of those cases, you will find its for other reasons, not a Battle Pass. The fact they happen to also have a battle pass but also did other things that perhaps frustrated their players is not connected. But a quick look at gaming news on those games will show you very clearly what people take issues with.

This is a brand new and sizeable feature, which very clearly is going to be a new development for the game. Its not something your just going to open the game one day and its suddenly there and you heard nothing about it.

It will be officially announced, when its finished and ready in full.

Thats exactly the point. There is
NO
need to datamine this because its for an update not even released yet.

We dont update the dev server changelog each and every single time its updated because its a work in progress sever and not the final patch form yet. We wait until the update is either A) Final or B) Another dev server.

There is no changelog or announcement for this yet, because its not out, released or announced yet.

You also left out the part where all of them also have a plethora of entirely free content on top of everything else the game offers.

Again. Nothing has been announced yet and people are forming conclusions entirely incorrectly without any of the correct info yet, based entirely off an unofficial datamine before any annocuemnts.

Im not quite sure where you got this from. Black Ops, Modern Warfare, Rocket League, World of Tanks, Fortnight, PUBG just to name but a few.

People don't like something we have not even announced, said anything remotely official or even had a chance to show or explain yet.

If we didn't introduce a feature, vehicle or something based entirely off of people knee-jerk reacting at the mere sight of something, nothing would get added.

Once again, you are basing this off data mines only without any official announcement.

Wait

for

the

News

Hence why people should not be basing everything of data mines and wait for official announcements.

And no, we are not going to explain things before the proper annocuemnts because right now, people are just mining things from a wip build.

IPM1 was given M833. Its not necessary for any other tanks.

To be clear, if new shells do come for the MA12 and CR 2 thats simply just bringing them up to speed with where the Leclerc already is and will also just be for 1 tank for both of those nations. France will still have 2 tanks equally as a good.

The developers are reviewing ammunition for both M1A2 and Challenger 2(F)

Generally yes, this is the case. But it may not always be the case. Particularly when updates of this size are released that have the work and content of 2 majors basically.

My to do list at the moment thanks to the update )))

The only thing reported in that area and subsequently fixed was commander NVD: