War Thunder

War Thunder Dev Tracker




31 Oct

Comment

Lots of vehicles have been in the files. It's meaningless.


As I said, Sweden will get the Strv 81 (RB.52) from next week as a GE prem.

Post
    OrsonES on Forums - Thread - Direct

Dear players and Fine Arts experts!


A new month has arrived, so it's time to proclaim the winners of our last month's Community competitions! As always, a lot of effort has been put into the content that was created, and the winners will be happy to receive their share of the prize fund totalling more than 4 500 Golden Eagles!


Interested in joining any of the competitions below yourself? Then don't waste any time and visit the forums for more information!

Straight Screenshot - 1 500



Creator: _CG_


Straight Screenshot - 1 500



Creator: PointyPuffin


Artistic Screenshot - 1 500

...

Read more
Comment

Since your just wishlisting, please go here:



There are no choppers this patch beyond the Ka-50 c*ckpit.



Yes but also next week Sweden will get Strv 81 (RB.52) as a GE premium because of the anniversary.

Comment

Too op ))


30 Oct

Comment

Right now its too soon to say.

Comment

There are no Spanish vehicles in the German premiums. If you referring to the Bf 109A, thats the Condor Legion. A detachment of Luftwaffe pilots who flew in the Spanish civil war.

Comment

They were added in the first place for that very reason, to plug the hole. Removing them without replacements and thus creating a self inflicted hole is even worse.


Once again though, this is an old and discussed to death subject and not the subject matter of this patch.

Comment

There is no aircraft in game like Mirage III V/Balzac. Trying to find counter arguments in paper planes added in 2013/4 under old policy's before France was even in the game or other premium / event vehicles based on prototypes and mockups.


None of this is on topic any more. You made your options loud and clear on VT-1, but trying to shoehorn it into every argument on anything unviable to introduce is just getting out of hand now.


Either keep it on subject or stop now. Mirage III V/Balzac is not viable to introduce. Its a testbed.



We have already responded to this. There are no viable replacements. And Horten is not paper.

Comment

Added long ago under old policies before France was even in the game. Not relevant here at all.


Oh and even they, paper designs as they were had plans for armament.

Comment

There is a huge amount of documentation and work on the Ho 229s armaments and plans for it in all its variants.


Mirage III V/Balzac was just a testbed / demonstrator / proof of concept like the Kestrel was for Harrier. Its not comparable to the Ho 229.


Regardless, we have answered this now. I have no idea why we are still on the topic of a testbed vehicle thats not at all even in the same league as a Harrier GR.1.


Obviously some of you are more opinionated on an entirely different situation with the FlakRak and you have made your point, but constantly trying to use it to justify every single counter argument isn't on topic.

Comment

If you referring to the flares, thats not necessary tied to a major update. They come when they come.

Comment

To be clear, we said no AV-8B which is the Gen II Harrier.

Comment

VT-1 is of French origin with American development too. But was involved with the modernization program of FlakRak and integrated with the program.


Operationally, it was used with France yes both in their Navy and Air Force.


Testbed and Demonstrator then, the point was, it was never armed and was not developed with weaponry of any kind. "It could have been armed" is not anything relevant.

Comment

This was never armed or even considered with weponary. It was a testbed.



Not at all. VT-1 was involved with the modernization project for FlakRak, planned and tested. Mirage IIIV/BALZAC was never even intended to be armed in the version that was built and had no provisions for it whatsoever. It was a testbed.