League of Legends Dev Tracker

IGN: Riot Codebear
Rank and Tier: Gold I and Tier II
Looking for One More: Mid Laner for Tier II lock-in

Champ Pool: Pref control mages and teamfight champs

Not sure. That's a question for the Merch team. I can ask!

This is great! Really excited to see how this evolves. Will definitely be using this tonight with my team to enhance the experience. Well done!

Honest mistakes happen. That's fair and I shouldn't have assumed your intentions. My apologies.

People sit on Seeker's because upgrading all the way to Zhonya's is not efficient. You're paying for the refreshing stopwatch cooldown, but you'd rather actually use the stopwatch first. Additionally, most midgame scenarios sees players build Fiendish Codex and not the Armguard if they're building one component on their way to a midgame Zhonya's.

Again you're not comparing apples to apples. I said armor is worse than heath per-gold early game. Comparing 900 gold of armor to 800 gold of health is not that comparison.

Sure, but the post was specifically comparing Jaurim's to Seeker's. No one wants to build three cloth armors and a pair of amplifying tomes either. You're still right about slot efficiency, though :)

Health divided by health is an easy one. Just do ratios.

For armor and MR, just add 100 to both sides of the fraction (a champion with 0 armor and 0 mr is still "100%" durable against those damage types). Then just as before, simple ratios.

Just apply to your favorite champion's base stats, and voila.

Hi! This is an example of disingenuous, alarmist, bad math. Shame on you for giving it a 96% upvote ratio, League subreddit.

1. "Look at the gold efficiency I calculated without using all of the stats!"
2. "Look at me comparing it to a different item with no regard for those differences!"

For reference, the item is just over 110% gold efficient at max stacks. Obviously the OP doesn't want to say that. Turns out not accounting for 5 ad (175 gold) on a cheap item is really meaningful. Who would have thought?

Armguard is also not "nearly 160% gold efficient" unless you're in the habit of rounding to the nearest 40%, which no reasonable analyst would. It's ~151%. If you had any goals other than delivering the most biased drivel possible, you'd probably say something like 150% gold efficient, but YOLO, I guess.

Jaurim's also stacks faster. 20 minions vs. 30. It's not a massive difference but it's there. It also builds into more items: Mall...

We made a minimum "floor" of $40,000 for regions. Meaning, the most voted org, will get $20K and the other two will still get $10K each

There's a couple of factors at play when we try and select nonprofits for these types of campaigns. We first try to use what players tell us is most meaningful and important to them based on their region through surveys and research - we want to make sure that we're picking issues that are important to you all, not just us.

Then there's a whole ton of fun regarding legal, financial, impact and governance evaluation to finalize the selections.

While we look at overhead ratios of nonprofits, we find it doesn't tell the whole story of where an org is, what they're doing, and the impact they're making. Our usual standard is to review 2 - 3 years of financial statements, as well as other factors to determine both the capacity and potential impact of a nonprofit.

You leave my sweet baby boy Settrigh alone, you MONSTER.

If everyone who does a thing professionally seems to be bad at it, I think that implies that either the job is very hard, the standards set forth are unachievable, or both.

That said, we'll always try to get better and meet players' expectations.

Thanks! I think it's inevitable that some champions will feel out of whack for some players when we have a game that's as complex as League. Glad to hear you're feeling good about it.

I am but a lowly meme regurgitating writer who has played like 4 games of post-rework Eve and never pre-rework. So I cannot help. D:

Production didn't fail this one, I messed it up. I didn't understand the system. For context discord is used as the platform for us to communicate with each other. While production pulls our audio for show through a different program that's run at the same time. Deficio's audio was fed to me through the secondary program but I failed to realise that and assumed I needed to buy time for a technical issue that wasn't actually happening.

Our production is always looking to step it up but this time it was my mistake not theirs.

Hope it wasn't too distracting from the discussion we had.

Hey, today I decided to go for a bit of a different style than the one I've been experimenting with this spring (more humor/banter) and went full serious mode for the gravity of playoffs. Trevor and I wanted to focus in on the top and jungle matchups especially (got some really great support from the games there too so that was nice) and tried to dive deep into them. Top for game 1 and jungle game 2 mostly. I wanted to make sure that we kept things focused and if we went for any jokes it would stick to stuff on screen so we wouldnt get any animal crossing tirades which I hope you appreciated. Anyways just wanted to check in here and ask how you felt about it. And hey, at least we got some action towards the end there.

PS: I'm like sorry I say like to much. I'm from California and its like all we do. I'm working on it :)

Unfortunately, we had a lot of technical limitations with geo-targeting for the voting hub. The voting selections will come up as the native language. I'm sorry, it's not ideal

Maybe you just don't like my style? Not all casting has to make every single viewer happy. I had several folks messaging me saying they enjoyed the joke, I'm sorry it's not to your taste, but I truly do appreciate the feedback. Just remember this is an entertainment product as well. I actively make choices about what I want to say and do, and I'm feeling pretty happy with the 3 games I've cast so far :D

I'm trying to go for a clean, full serious mode cast, for playoffs. Glad you are enjoying it :)

You're correct - the actual charity pools are based on a proportional basis. We wanted to just make sure that all non-profits are getting a baseline of support