Auberaun

Originally posted by BGID_to_the_moon

No, game's are intentionally unfair.

They don't put you in a game where you theoretically have a 50% chance to win based on ranks, otherwise you reach true MMR too quickly and stop playing. They give you 5 games where you have a 55% chance of winning, then 5 games where you have a 45% chance of winning and you climb by consistently outperforming in games you're supposed to lose. Makes the climb significantly harder than if you were consistently placed in fairly matched games. Pretty disgusting practice, but it keeps players playing.

Enjoy the grind.

Originally posted by A_Benched_Clown

How about activating it in aram ?

Been asked since start.

Unranked fun mod ISNT FUN 4v5

Originally posted by _Esdeath

What does this fix exactly? The other Nunu didn't move once for 3 minutes and the remake didn't show up. What's the difference if the timer is 90 seconds or 180? If the detection system is inherently flawed, changing timers won't change a thing.

Originally posted by oioioi9537

What does it mean by window length? Is that the length of time that the vote is active or length of time you have to start a remake vote?

Originally posted by cap_police875

This is a lie tho. I have had proof and have sent tickets to riot even talked to Dev’s on Twitter who acknowledge that match making is a problem but simply won’t put the time or resources into fixing it up front. Rather just make adjustments along the way. Which would take forever to fully fix. Dude you gotta be transparent we all know match making isn’t 50/50 that’s complete bullshit. There are several people who can pull up their match history and show you how unbalanced it is.

Originally posted by TripleShines

Hey i've been one of the people that has been very convinced that matchmaking is, to a degree, rigged. Part of this is due to the fact that afaik Riot has never made a statement directly denying that. Can you please state in no uncertain terms that matchmaking does NOT AT ALL take into account things like engagement, retention, match history, or player behavior, and that it focuses ONLY and without bias on finding fair matches and that each and every match is treated as its own entity without bias from previous marches?

If I hear it directly from Riot then I will gladly have faith in your statement until im shown strong evidence to the contrary.

Originally posted by potatorunner

Nice, manual moderation for high MMR would help alleviate some of these issues. I agree with the overzealousness comment as well.

I'll state that matchmaking optimizes for fair matches and low queue times, full stop.

I agree that this is naturally the top priority of a matchmaking algorithm (to get fast and relatively even games with players of similar rank) but if you would please comment on the patent filing that demonstrated the matchmaking algorithm takes more into account than just skill level (https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/1a/6a/cf/ae76598bc6da06/WO2014014840A1.pdf).

Specifically this section:

"[0032] In a preferred embodiment, the matching approaches described above can be performed in conjunction with "Rank Pick" as well. An example process 6000 is shown in Fig. 10. Players are first place...

Read more

Originally posted by 55redditor55

/u/Auberaun does loser’s queue exist?

Originally posted by _Fridod_

how do you plan to get rid of smurfing?

Originally posted by AbnormalConstruct

Why does Riot believe league shouldn’t have a team voice coms for ranked, when the often cited problems of such are reflected in Valorant and yet dealt with?

Originally posted by FearTHEReaper01

Will anonymity also be during the game? I feel like this would be a really great addition for streamers as well if theyre able to hide their games while it is playing.

Originally posted by Vesti

How are you all addressing rampant bots in ranked queue?

Originally posted by Serious_Historian578

The ideal system would be that you queue up a champion and a role and load directly into game from the launcher. Is that ever going to happen?

Originally posted by legatlegionis

The champion select anonimity is very bad for low ELO with the INSANE amount of bots that you have there. Honestly if you make it even harder to not play with bots, I might just abandon the game. I am already play less and if I can't know if the yuumi, taric, zilean, zoraka or janna is a real human behind the account then I might not play ever again.

I don't get why you focus so much on so many non problems. Sure there are dicks in champion select that will lookup teammates to talk trash but this is like 1% of matches in bottom ELO, on the other hand you have bots every third game.

It always feels that you target expression of anger instead of the issues of why people get so frustrated playing your game

Originally posted by kdubs248

How do you plan on curbing the high-elo betting issue that has been running rampant on tyler1s stream for months now?

Originally posted by Tywacole

Hello! Is there any chance to have a permanent fast paced mode where you can chose you champion? When URF or ultimate spellbook are available I'm literally spamming them.

I like playing ranked, but on some champs I'd just like a quicker / easier difficulty version of league.

Originally posted by DelugeofDelusion

Hey there, thanks for answering questions! Will we have the option to disable the loadout recommendations?

Originally posted by youngzhangbang

If someone is playing like a wintrader and banned as a "false positive", they should have been banned anyways for griefing, why are they in the elo where they are and still playing so bad that they trigger the wintrade (auto) ban?