Auberaun

Originally posted by Mertuch

Just wondering. If aiming as close to 50% is fact isn't that unfair? I mean if I performance way better than average of players in my division system won't choose worse team to make it the closest to 50%?

I mean. If sentence above is right that means playing league is actually pure coin flip. The more you're better the more you're playing with worse and opposite.

I still believe that if you're performing well your mmr should increase much faster to pump you up even faster (which solves problem with smurfs).

Idea where smurfes gain low ammount of LP is actually sick cause they break even more games than it usually would take.

Originally posted by Nicky-Santoro

What are the other rules like first blood?

Originally posted by NoTomboyGfWhyLivee

-Says the system aim for 50%

-Everyone ignores the deep implications of such a algorithm.

Honestly pretty easy money, don't even need to obscure terms for any possible jury people will just eat anything they.

Originally posted by Educational_Shoe4545

Anybody who plays the game knows this isn't true and you are lying. Bronzies get matched with golds all the time, specifically hardstuck golds with 2k games negative winrate per season, solely to make the bronze player lose because the system sees they're winning too often and climbing too fast. You can replicate this indefinitely with different accounts. Clear indicator that the mm algorithm is rigged. Unless you can prove it through the data you stored, I think you are trying to deceive and defraud children.

Originally posted by BGID_to_the_moon

No, game's are intentionally unfair.

They don't put you in a game where you theoretically have a 50% chance to win based on ranks, otherwise you reach true MMR too quickly and stop playing. They give you 5 games where you have a 55% chance of winning, then 5 games where you have a 45% chance of winning and you climb by consistently outperforming in games you're supposed to lose. Makes the climb significantly harder than if you were consistently placed in fairly matched games. Pretty disgusting practice, but it keeps players playing.

Enjoy the grind.

Originally posted by A_Benched_Clown

How about activating it in aram ?

Been asked since start.

Unranked fun mod ISNT FUN 4v5

Originally posted by _Esdeath

What does this fix exactly? The other Nunu didn't move once for 3 minutes and the remake didn't show up. What's the difference if the timer is 90 seconds or 180? If the detection system is inherently flawed, changing timers won't change a thing.

Originally posted by oioioi9537

What does it mean by window length? Is that the length of time that the vote is active or length of time you have to start a remake vote?

Originally posted by cap_police875

This is a lie tho. I have had proof and have sent tickets to riot even talked to Dev’s on Twitter who acknowledge that match making is a problem but simply won’t put the time or resources into fixing it up front. Rather just make adjustments along the way. Which would take forever to fully fix. Dude you gotta be transparent we all know match making isn’t 50/50 that’s complete bullshit. There are several people who can pull up their match history and show you how unbalanced it is.

Originally posted by TripleShines

Hey i've been one of the people that has been very convinced that matchmaking is, to a degree, rigged. Part of this is due to the fact that afaik Riot has never made a statement directly denying that. Can you please state in no uncertain terms that matchmaking does NOT AT ALL take into account things like engagement, retention, match history, or player behavior, and that it focuses ONLY and without bias on finding fair matches and that each and every match is treated as its own entity without bias from previous marches?

If I hear it directly from Riot then I will gladly have faith in your statement until im shown strong evidence to the contrary.

Originally posted by potatorunner

Nice, manual moderation for high MMR would help alleviate some of these issues. I agree with the overzealousness comment as well.

I'll state that matchmaking optimizes for fair matches and low queue times, full stop.

I agree that this is naturally the top priority of a matchmaking algorithm (to get fast and relatively even games with players of similar rank) but if you would please comment on the patent filing that demonstrated the matchmaking algorithm takes more into account than just skill level (https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/1a/6a/cf/ae76598bc6da06/WO2014014840A1.pdf).

Specifically this section:

"[0032] In a preferred embodiment, the matching approaches described above can be performed in conjunction with "Rank Pick" as well. An example process 6000 is shown in Fig. 10. Players are first place...

Read more

Originally posted by 55redditor55

/u/Auberaun does loser’s queue exist?

Originally posted by _Fridod_

how do you plan to get rid of smurfing?

Originally posted by AbnormalConstruct

Why does Riot believe league shouldn’t have a team voice coms for ranked, when the often cited problems of such are reflected in Valorant and yet dealt with?

Originally posted by FearTHEReaper01

Will anonymity also be during the game? I feel like this would be a really great addition for streamers as well if theyre able to hide their games while it is playing.

Originally posted by Vesti

How are you all addressing rampant bots in ranked queue?