War Thunder Dev Tracker

From what I hear a Lightning can also catch a U2 spyplane and catch Concorde for days. Why? "Because someone said it could".

Im sorry to tell you that whoever you heard that from, has no clue what they are talking about. Like many of these recent "leaks" or "rumors" its people making up random things and pretend to be some "insider expert".

MiG-23 is not already "made and being tested" .

The current MiG-21s have been performing perfectly fine since they were added and were even dominant for quite some time. Even now they remain more than competitive.

As I already said, we have much more planned, including this patch for the USSR. But the notion that the USSR is somehow in last place in jet battles when the MiG-21s have been more than competitive and above what many other nations have is simply untrue.

...

We sometimes do add skins for aircraft mid patch, possibly because they were being worked on before the major but at a much lower priority. For example if there are any model / texture issues, the devs are more likely to focus on that as we can always add the skins in later.

Nobody is being "strung along". People asked for an update and more information and the developers provided all the information they could in the current situation. When its possible to share more info, we will.

A few people being unable to keep a topic on subject and simply wish listing what they want to see over and over again is not a red flag. We cannot snap a MiG-23 model together, along with all the complex flight model variables, factors and unique elements that come with swing wing aircraft together overnight because a handful of people are demanding it be added. We are well aware of the interest for MiG-23 and its very much in the works. But models, development, new technologies and especially complex new flight mechanics like swing wing take considerable time and come with their own unique challenges (see the Mirage/Draken delta situation)

We have 9 nations in game, not just the USSR and USA. 3 nations have Phantoms all armed with Sparrows, not just the USA. 3 other nations on top of that also have long range missiles. France had to wait a period for its very competitive Mirage, as did Italy with its F-104.

Whilst...

Churchill III, Churchill VII, M4A3E2, T14, T26E1-1 - the number of spawns has been changed (reduced to 1, similar to other heavy tanks).


T26E1-1 - has been removed from setup 8.5.

Discuss it here!

The current provided changelog reflects the major changes within the game as part of this Update. Some updates, additions and fixes may not be listed in the provided notes. War Thunder is constantly improving and specific fixes may be implemented without the client being updated.

Churchill III, Churchill VII, M4A3E2, T14, T26E1-1 - the number of spawns has been changed (reduced to 1, similar to other heavy tanks).


T26E1-1 - has been removed from setup 8.5.

The current provided changelog reflects the major changes within the game as part of this Update. Some updates, additions and fixes may not be listed in the provided notes. War Thunder is constantly improving and specific fixes may be implemented without the client being updated.

As we said in article, to perform attack, you need to destroy enemy units and 3 buildings before you can attack Assault Line. Having only "Offensive Plan" from Market is not enough.

[x] doubt

Please share the link to replay.

Please re-read suggestion section rules.

If you have questions why your suggestion was NOT APPROVED, please PM a Suggestion Moderator.

And it has nothing to do with this topic.

MiG-23 is not planned to come this update. So its not on topic here. We have asked several times for it to be kept to the MiG-23 topics until there is a credible reason to discuss it in one of these topics.

We dont like to knock things of the list so early, but the topic cant go more than a week without straying back onto MiG-23 territory.

We always have a X.XXX.1.X update. They just dont always have names. Regia Marina had a name as it was the full release of the Italian Fleet too.

As you can see by the article you quoted, it does not say its the same as the Leopard 2A4. It states it used a range of sources to come to this conclusion including the 2A4 report.

And no, a screenshot in game comparing the 2A4 and Type 90 in game is not enough. Proper information is needed.

It differs in its secondary torpedo armament. Lübeck, has adjustable torpedo tubes (and 4 of them) to the Köln's 2 fixed 533 mm Mark 35 torpedo launchers.