League of Legends Dev Tracker

Jinx and Vi are sisters.

i spilled coffee all over myself 7 minutes before the show started today 🙃

bruh

NA

I think around 13mins. It was clipped out on Reddit haha

I giggled at that TSM chant after "that sequence" of play.

Damn. I missed it. I'm so sorry.

I had so much fun during that sequence and hope everyone had a laugh watching it. I had the pleasure of making fun of G2 when I met them after the show. That was special too haha

Canyon hit back in game 2 🤌🏾

So few people remember the original name. I applaud you. SK 1.6 was where it was at.

There's just too much data here for us to gather all, but we talked a bit about the players with the most kill involvements in our prematch

Just jumping in - we wanted to play it this week to set the stage for FNC potentially hitting 10 000 kills LEC/EU LCS all time this week :)

im on kaisa's skincare routine

I think a lot about how much I miss casting with Mitch.

We have hugely different backgrounds and skill levels at the game but we were very aligned on how we thought games should be delivered on-air and had similar senses of humour we got to share during casts.

Miss that boi, hope he's doing well.

This is a somewhat misquote. Items are over 100% gold efficient. Simple things like BF Sword and Giant's belt are already over 100% so larger completed items should be even better.

As a rule of thumb, I like putting items at 90-100% gold efficiency from raw stats and then the rest of the over-100% efficiency is whatever goes into the unique effects. It's really more like 90% + 25%. But then you have to tune the items and pay attention to gameplay impact.

A few places, though easy to miss. Confirming it's the case again here too!

enjoy :)

We recorded a bunch of these triathalon pieces with players over the past couple weeks... and we suddenly had A LOT of them on our hands and thought it'd be fun to just make a day out of it on broadcast :)

It's about the same. the NET EFFECT is 0.4%, which is (high mastery effect on the observed winrate) minus (low mastery effect on the observed winrate).

High mastery players still perform significantly higher (~2% than the observed WR) for most cases

It's worth noting that different champs have different "Mains Game Share" at different MMR's.

I tried many different interpretations of mains (MMR + Played over X games of champ, MMR + games played at Z rating, MMR + Y champ mastery, MMR + Games with a decay function for when the games were played), etc.

The most consistent one was just champion mastery at 100k+ (which helped, because it was also simpler to implement).

At 100k (compared to something like 50k) players were consistently outperforming 50k players, but hit a plateau of performance, so that's where I put the bar of performance increase for "being a main". It was also a relatively consistent static increase whether Masters+ players were considered or Silver players were considered.

The TLDR of this is mainly that:

• Newer players of the champion tank the winrate about as much as the mains increase it (lower quantity of mains, even if they are performing better relative to ...