League of Legends Dev Tracker

This is clearly a typo but at this point im going to pitch this to the dev team

All I could think of during that play but no way it’s correct to flame TSM mid-fight.

Good job lady.

I was so bummed by that line haha, I tagged in last second to give dash a break before another hosting day tomorrow and wasn't fully briefing myself on the written lines.

Good game for the fellow "Naut dying" gamers

Cool idea I’ll pass it along

Except that Teemo’s auto range is Aatrox’s Q range. So either guess where it’s going literally every time or take 500 damage from QQE with the chance of WQ3

Teemo Aatrox is unplayable. Anyone who plays Teemo should instantly know any spell-based champion f*cks him. Anyone with innate dashes tends to f*ck him. How ADD though that it would be a good matchup is beyond me. That sh*t is unplayable.

This is a perfectly normal thing to say.

You heard nothing.

Now THIS is a fresh meme sheeeeeeesh.

no

It will take mode into account, but I can't guarantee that it will give you a particular runeset.

I wouldn't call it a specific plan, but if we were to dig deep here the starting point would be to understand why folks choose to smurf, see what motivations we're able to solve for, solve for those, and then try to defend against some of the more nefarious ones.

Examples of some smurfing motivations I think we could tackle reasonably well:

• I want to learn how to play a new champion or role but not tank my rank or be likely to get stomped in a game
• I want to play some chill anonymous game where no one sees I'm online
• My LP gains are awful and I think I need to make a new account to climb
• I want to play matches with my friends seem more fair or that they'll have a better time in

Ones we will probably never want to support

• I want to stomp on players significantly worse than me
• I want to anonymously be a terrible human being

Our stance hasn't really changed from this. I'd challenge the idea that the problems are "dealt with" to the extent that voice chat exists consequence-free in Valorant, not too dissimilar from League's state of continuously investing in dealing with negative chat.

Not to say that things are set in stone and we'd never do it, but the landscape hasn't changed meaningfully since our last statement here.

No plans for that right now. Something being loosely talked about since you do see it in Wild Rift Legendary Queue and there's folks who have asked for it, so I personally think there's some merit (IMO off the cuff take is that this should be optional), but no one has started work on investigating the space thoroughly yet.

Unfortunately we have so little time we rarely get to dive deep into niche topics, and it's always a debate what content to put on air. I wish we could spend more time on all our segments but games always come first

There's a difference between world first and something we've seen in champs queue and competitive. I hear your point, but it wasn't as surprising and it lost. So it wasn't the right call to reference the history of it in this context.

Recommendations will be updated daily so don't worry about using outdated recs!

Edit: Sorry guys just updating, this is not actually accurate. Rune/ability upgrades will still be lagged a patch, but we're working on a solution to get them updating more regularly. For now, though, it shouldn't have much impact and will prevent anomalous recommendations. It will likely take some time for the meta to sort out after a new patch as well, and we can do some manual adjustments if necessary.

ITS MY JOB lol