League of Legends Dev Tracker

Originally posted by Abarn279

OK nobody is talking about this but this is a BIG issue for anyone who runs amateur leagues in customs. Client match history only goes 20 games back and the web match history is currently the ONLY way for you to pull history for your own customs. opgg does not work for this as the riot Api doesn't support pulling custom games for a player

Cc /u/RiotTuxedo

Originally posted by mazrrim

ah I see, is this a continuous line for each patch since launch? What does the thickness of the line indicate?

It would also be a lot easier to visualise if there was a direction arrow on the line if the patches since release thing is true.

Originally posted by Spideraxe30

Could you share the B/Ds for this year's releases so far like Viego, Gwen, Mundo etc, was there a marginal increase in engagement from releasing champs tied to one another

Originally posted by Zoli_Ben

Hey Reav3, can you please send me current state of Dr. Mundo, Nautilus, Volibear and Mordekaiser? Thanks a lot in advance if you do, would help a lot right now!

Originally posted by mazrrim

Does the really small line going right then up mean there are a really small number of neeko players who play her a ton (~2.2x more than the average player of a champion?). Do all champions have a similar branch off.

How does this graph have multiple data points for Breadth in general, especially with multiple data points on the same Breadth? How can Neeko have a Breadth of ~1.1 and for this Breadth also have a depth of both ~1.18 and ~1.3

Originally posted by mazrrim

If you filter on most unpopular you get

1. Aurelion Sol

2. Skarner

3. Neeko

4. Taliyah

5. Udyr

This is plat+ soloq though, curious what metric is used to say "FAR" from the most unpopular.

Originally posted by Naymliss

It's always been funny how neekomains is so popular but neeko herself is one of the least popular champs in league.

Originally posted by playhacker

On Aug 11th around 10:00 AM PST, the League Web Match History site will be permanently taken offline.

August 11th of next year??

Originally posted by Smallzfry

Is that date a typo? Should it be September 11th, or is that saying August 11th for next year?

Also, the reason I stopped using the built-in match history page is because it stopped working years ago. It then took long enough to fix that I (and my friends) got used to using op.gg instead. Just like Dominion and Twisted Treeline, this seems like it's just being removed because Riot neglected it to the point that it can't be salvaged easily. I really don't like that everything is being moved to third-party tools, but I guess I see the reasoning when there's good drop-in replacements.

Originally posted by weebwindman

Will you do any compensation nerds or what to call it?

Draven, no matter how bad he feels with new items, is currently pretty strong according to win rates. Just straight up buffing him when he is already a strong pick will make perma ban, no?

Perhaps some base damage is lowered or cool down on ult?

I love Draven more than any other champ, played since some weeks after his release, with you know, real passive and all. Managed to get D1 Draven only some seasons back. So I am very happy and excited to see this. But also afraid to see him gutted after it.

Originally posted by prowness

Yo real talk, that Draven buff seems legit.

• It helps him kill if he’s been playing properly (getting stacks and not dying).

• It doesn’t help a Draven get more ahead (since his stacks reset to 0 upon a kill).

• it isn’t a mechanic that’s too powerful when behind (he loses half stacks on death, compared to how useful Viego’s passive is when he’s behind).

That’s a perfect example of a wildly experimental change that doesn’t seem oppressive in pro play on paper and can likely be balanced with buffs and nerfs (I.e. reduce ult ratio, or make it so that half stacks is the threshold, etc.).

Originally posted by Pedrinhodanight__

Never seen things through that perspective, it must be hard seeing people hate your work and working around such a toxic community such as League's, I guess I am just salty because I really disliked the Lillia rework (plz bring old prance back Lillia is legitimately depressing to play)

Originally posted by Swiftswim22

We would like to do more VGUs than we've done for 2021, but the rate isn't likely to go up enormously in the near future.

Weird, cuz y'all had previously said you were only doin 1 vgu in 2021 cuz of covid?

Sucks major ass tbh, esp wit the current poll system. The votin def the best way to get the communities opinion, which I appreciate y'all doin greatly! But it also means y'all recognize that there are 5+ champs that NEED updatin & ignorin all but 1 for an entire yr. Like what does that say about your priorities if y'all acknowledge issues & then do nothin bout em, sometimes for 2+ yrs like in the case of shyv & nocturne. Not trynna flame you directly or anythin, I understand there's prob a whole slew of people involved in makin these decisions, but it really is awful to have your fav char look like dogshit for...

Read more

Originally posted by Pedrinhodanight__

When you f**k up reworks of course people drop those champs, for example, Amumu has been an actual good rework, minor tweaks, and some interesting changes, while with Lillia you guys f**ked up her early game and gutted her mos fun mechanic (Prance), is it really surprising that people would stop playing a champ you guys make unrecognizable instead of actually solving their issues and talking to mains to at least make them feel similar?

Originally posted by bns18js

Soraka

Wish (R)

Heal :: 100/135/170/205/240 >>> 100/130/160/190/220

[NEW] Clears Grievous Wounds on Allies before applying the Heal.

The numbers you listed are for Soraka's W Astral Infusion. Not her R wish. So which one is it are you guys really buffing?

I think it makes more sense for her ult. It's your ULTIMATE ability so that should feel good and impactful. It's also unlikely to break anything while slightly increasing her performance overall.

Where as her spammable W heal is the more problematic of the two. This is the main source of player frustration where a single target gets repeatedly healed and not dying. This should still be subject to grievous until soraka's power budget shifts at least, because it tends to leads to really bad gameplay patterns if strong.

Originally posted by _AIQ_

I do not (or at least "hope not") think that Riot is reducing it to 1 a year. This year was unique because of Covid and because of their dislike of VGUs in general they were put on the back burner.

VU IMO are very important in that a EZ/Morg level update would help so many champions feel better.

VGUs on the other hand just need to be peeled like a bandaid. Riot just needs to do it and get them over with.

Corki, Shyvana, Shaco, Quinn etc... they know the list already, just do it and complete it. VUs will always be accepted better than VGUs as no one will generally complain that Chogath is changed from the 2009 pixel mess he is now to an actual void creature that does the same thing kit-wise.

Riot needs to weigh the opportunity cost of losing half of a .5% play rate champion and realize the amount of players they could get instead if the champions fantasy was more modern. They need to stop making excuses that they "care" about the players of those c...

Read more

Originally posted by mazrrim

while this is much appreciated could you consider a more active version like empowered ws (q hitting then w) removing and giving protection from grievous for the duration.

This isn't going to change grievous wounds being instantly re-applied allowing for healing to be a dedicated playstyle, it just makes the ult much bigger.

Numbers should go down on healing to compensate for this but it makes the entire game feel less like not getting to play when all your kit is cut by 60%.

Also healing items are basically still bugged and dont apply properly to work on the same statline as grievous wounds

Grievous wounds isn't cancelled out additively in the same stat line as healing bonus as you might expect

60 healing reduction isn't changed to 25% healing reduction with 35% bonus

If you would heal 100 you heal 100x0.4x1.35 = 54 instead of 100 x 0.75 =75

This means all items like ardent and staff feel awful to buy.

Originally posted by mazrrim

Please PLEASE let me play around grievous wounds as soraka , I have been unable to play her in d2-masters elo ever without it feeling like I am trolling after enemy rushes these items plus ignite at 60%

Originally posted by prxncebubblegum

can we see how are Seraphine and Evelynn doing there?