Valorant Dev Tracker

Originally posted by Prodigal2k

Please add a forfeit option. My last 5 games were ruined by leavers. I beg of you, free me from the chains of unenjoyable games.

Originally posted by fleta336

Yea I’m shocked that riot overlooked this

Originally posted by AlexRaidz

None of this worked for me

Originally posted by PM_ME_PRETTY_SUNSETS

Personally, I usually believe in the more customization you can offer the players and the more control over their experience the better. So I would like to see the ability to totally mute voice, text, and ping chats from specific teammates. I also understand the need to keep things from getting too cluttered and confusing so wouldn't be too upset to see the ping get rolled into a voice chat mute. Because in my experience the people who are worth VC muting are not normally making callouts in a constructive manner and it's unlikely they would be using the ping system for it's intended purpose.

I tend to believe in a toggle for more in depth stuff like this tho, that can be turned off by default (the simpler version) and purposefully turned on by players that want more control over their experience.

Or you could just implement a system that ignores repeated pings or gives players chat cooldowns if it detects the use of a hotkey.

Originally posted by mappleonmars

I would suggest limiting the amount of ping in a certain period of time to prevent abuses like we are seeing (more and more) in the past days from trolls. Also, tie the ping mute to the chat muting option would be great!

Edit: If you really read this message, I hope you guys will add a battlepass to purchase, it would be something worth to survey in my opinion =)

Originally posted by Jun1nxx

Hey, i know im pretty late to the topic but could i ask you some questions?
I did a lot of tests with the 2 PCs i have here and couldnt come to a conclusion, found this topic and saw that a riot dev was answering stuff and tought: why not ask?

• Is valorant more CPU intensive or gpu intensive?
Also, why is there such a small difference in performance when comparing high resolutions with low resolutions? say 1920 vs 1280 both are 16:9 resolutions but in my tests the fps difference is barely noticeable.

Not that im complaining, its good to have good performance on 1920*1080 but i feel that low resolutions should give more fps compared to full hd.

Originally posted by lazulilord

It’s a f**king videogame. Your anticheat doesn’t need to be this extreme, and there are already cheats for Valorant that are working, blatant aimbots and wallhacks. Why are you really doing this?

Originally posted by Juuhonber

Removing "VBoxUSBMon.sys" did it for me.

Originally posted by BerricDondarrin

got a core2extreme CPU x9650 3.0ghz

Originally posted by JAM1B

awesome!

Love the game :)

Originally posted by BerricDondarrin

people care more about in-game mechanics and end-game target. That's why Fortnite, Overwatch, Apex so popular.

CPU bound? that's not good news for me I ntgl threw most of the money on GPU since I live in a low type country we think for gaming all u need is a graphics card so while I have a good graphics card my CPU is really shitty

Originally posted by FixTheNewCrash

Update ME !@

Still keep going, cant understand this Kernel anticheat.. so stupid its like you cant boot up cheats via the mouse drivers.....

Originally posted by 2BuckMoose

Hi! I'm not sure if you are replying to this old thread anymore, but will there be something like CSGO's Overwatch once ranked comes out? I think once a player reached a certain rank or experience with the game a player should be allowed to see a report and watch and dictate a ban and if the player (who is "overwatching") continuously makes a false positive then this privilege can be removed. This could possibly be applied to live games such as a case where a player reports the enemy, the "overwatcher" is given the option to watch the game live. This would seem like a cool idea and I'm just wondering if you would implement this? (Sorry for being a long post and I hope you see this and have a good week!)

Originally posted by PresTronPaul

This is a rather frustrating user experience. If Vanguard goes from working to not, and the path to resolution is opening a ticket and being told what to remove, then Riot should cut out the middle man and just have Vanguard instruct the user as to what is "untrusted". Security by obscurity is usually not helpful, but in the anticheat case where the client is untrusted, but to play the game their inputs have to at some point be trusted, it makes sense to have the anticheat functionality not be clear.

As someone who does non-work development on their own machine (I run WSL2, have a yubikey, etc) I'm very concerned by the fact there seems to be some drivers that Riot sees as bad actors, but have valid use cases (ie VirtualBox). While this game is currently provided for free, I am investing time into it. It would be (and currently is) very frustrating if that time ended up being "wasted" if Riot thinks the way I use my computer isn't one they want to support. It is especially ...

Read more

Originally posted by kartios

As much as I can appreciate your support as someone who has been in a similar role as you, it doesn't look good for a random Riot employee to be instructing people to delete System32 drivers without any explanation or acknowledgement from Riot itself. Why should some random virtualbox USB driver be affecting Vanguard? What happened to not scanning hardware?