Battlefield 2042 Dev Tracker

Reddit isn't much different from the other platforms you outlined though. Ultimately it's people coming together for (shared) opinions.

This is a temporary connection issue and our team is on it to fix it.

Isn’t this another discussion topic about Hourglass though

Nope, that’s all him.

Playing a match may remedy it. If you've already claimed it once, you won't be able to claim it again. Reloading the game may fix that if you're still seeing a claim option.

Hello loyal but disgruntled customer, first off we would like to take a moment to thank you for your ongoing service on the Battlefield in ensuring that Lassie, otherwise known by ordnance as Ranger or Doggo Models have a brief home before they're turned into scrap metal.

We here at command would like to state that the current shortage of Doggo Models is temporary and had only taken place today. We're working with the relevant stakeholders to get a new batch sent out as soon as possible, this may be next week or the week after.

As soon as we know, we'll relay that and get it out there in an update.

Naturally, people's enjoyment on the field is just as important to us as off the field and we sincerely apologise for any inconvenience this brief moment of diagruntledness may have caused you.

TLDR: It's the penguins man, they're on a strike. Give us a little bit of time.

Correct.

This. Shout out to the team for testing the new update publicly, ahead of release, and then swiftly making adjustments to address this area of feedback from the community.

This is what we’re working to improve even further in the future and I’m looking forward to those results and playing alongside you.

Happy Birthday to you!

Appreciate that it's disappointing, but as we have already stated we have included as many Vault Attachments for Sidearms as much as possible.

We've been pretty clear that these Vault Weapons (all Vault Weapons) were never intended to be adapted for All-Out Warfare let alone for Attachments. When we make this conversion there are a lot of things that we must tackle, such as alignment of the attachments themselves onto models as well as sizing constraints and positioning of those attachments versus the functionality of the actual gun.

We had stated within the Update Notes that we have made some available, where possible. That is not having the gall to mention it, it is having the will of transparency to be upfront on what is taking place.

We've been clear on that, and we will continue to do so. If there are further adaptations for attachments in the future, we'll relay that too.

Hey there,
Just wish to set expectations here, that it is not going to be DLSS V3. We've done this to take some of the improvements and fixes in later versions while still using DLSS 2.5.
We have no current plans for DLSS 3, but we'll continue to look at it where improvements make sense versus performance losses or gains.

Hey there,

Just wish to set expectations here, that it is not going to be DLSS V3. We've done this to take some of the improvements and fixes in later versions while still using DLSS 2.5.

We have no current plans for DLSS 3, but we'll continue to look at it where improvements make sense versus performance losses or gains.

On there way, sir.

https://twitter.com/BattlefieldComm/status/1685072573560741888

I was always told to look both ways when crossing roads, never got told to look up!

There is quite a lot to read around the lore. Some of it takes place outside the game:

https://www.ea.com/games/battlefield/battlefield-2042/the-world-of-battlefield-2042#2048

https://www.ea.com/games/battlefield/battlefield-20...

Yeah as a heads up... pre-loading is currently only available for PS4/5 :-)

I messed up the initial upload. The correct version of the episode is now live.

Let's play tomorrow first and then let us know how it feels!

What we called out in the podcast is that we wrongly anticipated how players would engage with vehicles (alongside how the new call-in system would work). That was on us as developers, not on players.

I disagree that this comment is gaslighting. It's merely stating that our observation in how players would engage with vehicles was different from our expectation pre-launch.

It was most certainly a cool location, we agree. But it was not a good location in terms of gameplay, and that's why we removed it to ensure we could improve the overall flow on other areas of the map.