Apex Legends Dev Tracker

Once you link the new platform to the EA ID that is cross-progressed, this platform will then have access to the progress and content of the cross-progressed account. Worth noting and stressing that any content on this new platform getting linked in will be lost.

If the account is “a new one” then there's likely nothing to be lost, but if you link in a platform that does have content and/or progress associated with it (because it’s already linked to another EA ID), this WILL be lost in favor of the cross-progressed account’s stats and content. This goes back to the “Unlinking can disassociate progress and content” aspect called out previously. 

We discussed missing badges in the above post. As for “other things,” please start a thread on ~Answers HQ~ with more details so that the support team can investigate further.

To access your Xbox progress on Steam, you need to make sure that your Xbox and Steam accounts are linked to the same EA account. First, you’ll want to find out which EA account your Xbox account is linked to. From there, make sure your Steam account is linked to the same EA account. You can manage your account connections ~here~. Once you have linked your Steam account to the same EA ID, you will then be able to access your content from Steam. It’s important that you do not unlink your Xbox account from the EA ID that it is currently linked to since the progress will not move between EA IDs

Support would need more details to look into this. Please start a thread on ~Answers HQ~ detailing your accounts and what you're encountering.

Some badges were not be included as part of the merge process as outlined in our blog in late October ahead of the rollout. That said, as mentioned in the post above, we're aware of some badges missing and are working on their return but a list of applicable badges is not yet available. 

If the Cross Progression merge failed for any reason (ex. it is possible the service may have been busy at the time), then the accounts are not merged and are not Cross Progressed. Logging in at a later time will trigger the merge process again, so by now it’s assumed that this has already been resolved with another login. If you still believe you have not received Cross Progression, please start a thread on ~Answers HQ~ with details so that support can investigate.

Please start a thread on ~Answers HQ~ detailing your situation so that the support team can investigate.

Amazon Prime skins are not treated differently than other content. Please create a support ticket on ~EA Help~ and the support team will investigate.

Heirloom shard drop counts don’t stack/merge. The number associated with the primary account becomes your count going forward.

The ability to have multiple PlayStation accounts linked to one EA account was possible at one point in time., but that's no longer the case. That said, some legacy accounts that went through the Cross Progression merge process did merge content from multiple PSN accounts together.

From these two PSN accounts, whichever of your accounts was the highest became your primary account. Any content associated with the lower leveled PSN account would've been merged into the primary account so long as it was still linked at the time you received Cross Progression. If you believe you are missing content (outside of what has already been outlined as out of scope) please start a thread on ...

Yes; Ranked is outside of the scope of Cross Progression as each platform has its own Ranked experience/leaderboard.

When you play Ranked with a Cross Progression enabled account (which is all accounts going forward) you will earn RP on the platform you are playing on. If you then use the same cross-progressed account on another platform in ranked matches you will earn RP on that platform’s leaderboard. There are no plans to extend Cross Progression to ranked (one master platform-all leaderboard).

[[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) is the correct email to receive confirmation you've won from. Congrats!

it me! hello OP :D

So if given to pick 2 categories from here which 2 would pick to see more of in 2024 and why..

u/RV-Devan can attest, I literally started every balance meeting with, "They're still using Bloodhound over Seer, I don't know why. He should be busted in comp."

We absolutely theory-craft and try to predict how the meta will shift, and I can't remember the last time something has flown completely under the radar. We definitely over/under estimate things though... I've personally been surprised by the amount of Conduit usage in scrims, but I love to see it.

I do think their are a couple niche picks that are on the precipice of gaining popularity. Maybe I'm off the mark, I'll let y'all continue to explore that yourselves :)

I certainly have not given up on Mirage. We're not done with him yet.

He's my favourite Legend ( him and Newcastle ), and I'm eager to iron-out all the buggy nuances with his clones. We've added a number of things that have certainly helped him, but nothing yet that has really pushed him into the spotlight. I still want to see how we can push on him to give him more team utility and squad viability.

No set time... I think it depends on the specific meta and how well it's being received. Gibby meta for example... that's one that stuck around for awhile because we deemed it "healthier" than Caustic meta. Bubble fights were super engaging and interesting, even though they eventually became stale. Sometimes certain balancing changes require more overhead to get right... how do you nerf Horizon tac correctly without gutting the ability or making her unfun to play? Is it a numbers change or will it require other departments? There is hesitation sometimes, not because we're not thinking about/working on it, but because we want to get it right.

The “LMG identity crisis” is something we’ve discussed quite a bit lately. Turns out removing reloads a la L-STAR is all we need!

But seriously, you bring up a lot of the same observations we've had internally. So I'll flip it back to you: How would you like to see LMGs change to make them more viable, unique, but not oppressive in higher skill bands? It can be tricky to make weapons with that big of a magazine feel fair on the receiving end, especially with our TTK hovering around a lot of classic reload moments for most meta ARs/SMGs.

There is no set metric...

But, lemme say... when we saw 95-98% of team comps were using Valk... "hoo-boy!" we certainly took note and felt more confident with Valk changes and the introduction of the Evac Tower. And seeing that much Seer-Cat-Bang / Seer-Cat-Horizon certainly influenced our decision to look at adjustments over last couple seasons.

But we DO want more diversity in the Legends in comp. More underdog teams with off-meta picks that feel viable in their element. If something seems to dominate, it's likely a sign we have an issue we should have a look at. And sometimes we make a change as a result.

The short answer is that during development we thought the Arc Snare was incredibly strong! TOO strong in fact!

The others didn't restrict movement like hers did and it was incredible frustrating to deal with. So much so that we felt she NEEDED to stow her weapon to give her some disadvantage to not simply throwing it on a target mid-flight and rendering them helpless. So we actually wanted the ability to not be appealing to use during a gun fight. We wanted it as an initiation tool that she could follow up on - rather than something to pin an opponent down with while trading blows. It was a very dominant strategy in early playtests that made her feel too powerful to deal with, and too surprising to instantly be locked down and unable to make an escape.

That being said, times are different, and Ash has been scuttling in the lower end for a while, so we've had discussions around her abilities and what could be improved. This and her Ult precision specifically ha...